<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Guardian to launch games blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chocolateandvodka.com/2004/07/29/the-guardian-to-launch-games-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chocolateandvodka.com/2004/07/29/the-guardian-to-launch-games-blog/</link>
	<description>bubbling enthusiasm for $arbitrary_topic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:57:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chocolateandvodka.com/2004/07/29/the-guardian-to-launch-games-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chocolateandvodka.com/?p=301#comment-504</guid>
		<description>The Guardian blogs are not consistent - the Online blog does have permalinks, as does the new Games blog, but the News and the US Election blogs do not. I do know that there is a good reason why this is, but you&#039;re going to have to take my word for it that that&#039;s the case. I would like all the blogs to have permalinks and comments, but I&#039;ll settle for 50% for the moment. 
However, if a lack of permalinks is your only criteria for criticism of The Guardian&#039;s blogging policy, then I&#039;m surprised. Personally, I think they &#039;get&#039; blogs a lot more than any other UK publication at the moment. Not all their features are spot on, it&#039;s true, but they&#039;re making a good go at getting their head round the medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Guardian blogs are not consistent &#8211; the Online blog does have permalinks, as does the new Games blog, but the News and the US Election blogs do not. I do know that there is a good reason why this is, but you&#39;re going to have to take my word for it that that&#39;s the case. I would like all the blogs to have permalinks and comments, but I&#39;ll settle for 50% for the moment.<br />
However, if a lack of permalinks is your only criteria for criticism of The Guardian&#39;s blogging policy, then I&#39;m surprised. Personally, I think they &#39;get&#39; blogs a lot more than any other UK publication at the moment. Not all their features are spot on, it&#39;s true, but they&#39;re making a good go at getting their head round the medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chocolateandvodka.com/2004/07/29/the-guardian-to-launch-games-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chocolateandvodka.com/?p=301#comment-503</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the Guardian truly does understand blogging. If they did, the Guardian Weblog would have permalinks. It&#039;s almost as if there&#039;s a breakdown in internal communication there - why have some actual blogs, set up properly, and one that just uses a rudimentary blog format without actually being a blog?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t think the Guardian truly does understand blogging. If they did, the Guardian Weblog would have permalinks. It&#39;s almost as if there&#39;s a breakdown in internal communication there &#8211; why have some actual blogs, set up properly, and one that just uses a rudimentary blog format without actually being a blog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

